What characterizes an "argumentum ad nauseum" scenario?

An "argumentum ad nauseum" refers to a tactic where a point is repeatedly stated or argued to the point of exhaustion or boredom, rather than through logical reasoning or new evidence. The key characteristic of this scenario is the repetitive nature of the argument, which does not lead to a productive discussion, nor does it resolve a debate. Instead, it relies on the idea that if an assertion is repeated enough times, it may be accepted as true.

Repetition can distract from the lack of substantive evidence or reasoning, ultimately failing to provide a compelling or rational basis for the argument being made. This strategy often leads to frustration and disengagement rather than clarification or consensus. In contrast, the other options involve more constructive elements of argumentation, such as evidence, causality, or concise summaries, which do not align with the concept of "argumentum ad nauseum."